Hi I am on my second ticket the first challenge was
successful, I put a very short reply on line refussing point blank to
take any liability to their paperwork. This is what I wrote:
————–start responce ticket one——————
Without prejudice, all rights reserved.
Dear Sirs,
I refer you to "An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crown".
Which states I can not be fined if I have not been tried
in court of law by a jury of my peers. See section 2:12. That all Grants
and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures of particular persons before
Conviction are illegall and void.
As you have not issued a fine then this is a mute point in
which case, I absolutely deny your claim, that the amount claimed, or
any amount at all, is due to you from me as I have not entered into any
contract with the company called 'Hastings Borough Council'.
Your Faithfully
xxxxxxx xxxxxxx (al lower case)
—————-end responce ticket one————————-
They
wrote back saying they noticed I had a valid permit and that this time
only they would let it go but that I could pay the other outstanding
ticket at a reduced rate if I wanted to take advantage of their offer.
They basically ignored my challenge and made it sound like they were
doing me a favor.
I did not take them up on their offer.
———end ticket one, victory for the free man!————
——————–ticket two———————————
I
wanted to see if the notice for clarification would work so I submitted
a notice to the councel once they sent throught their pink notice
(which tries to scare you). This was my notice to the councel for the
second ticket:
—————–start responce ticket two——————-
xx xxxxx xxxx
xxxxxxxx
xxxx
xxx I have removed my details so where you see xxx put your own
details this is my address details and below is my name details.
June 29th, 2011
Re: ZHxxxxxxxxxx, dated 21/05/2011 x's here are the ticket number.
Notice of Discharge of Outstanding Fixed Penalty Charge and Request for Clarification.
Hastings Borough Council
Parking Services
Aquila House
Breeds Place
Hastings
TN34 3UY
Dear Sirs,
Please read the following notice thoroughly and carefully
before responding. It is a notice. It informs you. It means what it
says.
The reason why you need to read carefully is simple. I am
offering conditional agreement. This removes controversy, and means that
you no longer have any ultimate recourse to a court of law in this
matter, because there is no controversy upon which it could adjudicate.
You always have the option of dragging these conditions into a court of
law only to be told that they are, indeed, perfectly lawful. That is, of
course, always your prerogative should you decide to waste your time.
For this reason it is important that you consider and
respond to the offer in substance. The 'nearest official form' will not
suffice, and consequently is likely to be ignored by myself without any
dishonor on my part.
On the other hand there is a time-limit on the agreement
being offered. It is reasonable, and if it runs out then you and all
associated parties are in default, removing any and all lawful excuse on
your part for proceeding in this matter.
For these reasons it is recommended that you carefully
consider this notice and respond in substance, which means actually
addressing the points raised herein.
You have apparently made allegations of criminal conduct against me.
You have apparently made demands upon me.
I do not understand those apparent demands and therefore
cannot lawfully fulfill them. I seek clarification of your document so
that I may act according to the law and maintain my entire body of
inalienable Natural Rights.
Failure to accept this offer to clarify and to do so
completely and in good faith within 7 (seven) days will be deemed by all
parties to mean you and your principal or other parties abandon all
demands upon me.
I conditionally accept your offer to agree that I am legal
fiction 'person' Mr x xxxxxxx and that I owe £50 for services rendered
by your company, upon proof of claim of all of the following:
1. Upon proof of claim that I am a person, and not a human being.
2. Upon proof of claim that you know what a 'person' actually is, in legal terms.
3. Upon proof of claim that you know the difference between a 'human being' and a 'person', legally speaking.
4. Upon proof of claim that you know the difference between 'legal' and a 'lawful'.
5. Upon proof of claim that I am legal fiction 'person' Mr
R Stewart, being the entity to which your paperwork was addressed, and
not Robert: of the Stewart family, as commonly called.
6. Upon proof of claim that the charge was the result of a lawful investigation unmarred by prejudice.
7. Upon proof of claim that I am a member of the society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are enforcing.
8. Upon proof of claim that I showed you some sort of identification.
9 Upon proof of claim that there is a nameable society
that I belong to and that the laws covered within any alleged
transgressions state that they apply to me within that named society.
Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity
By: *** xxxxxxx: of the xxxxxxx family *** (Agent)
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Reserved
Please
address all future correspondence in the matter to a direct Human Self,
namely Robert: of the Stewart family, as commonly called.
Encl: Original paperwork as received.
—–end responce ticket two————–
They
have written back ignoring my request and treating it as a rejection
'Formal Notice of Rejection' is what they put in bold at the top of the
letter.
They have said that if I do not pay or appeal to a parkinf
adjudicator within 28 days they will bump up the charge and if I do not
pay that they will maybe go to court. I shall scan the letter and submit
it in a post when I get time. My plan is to remind them that I sent a
notice to them asking for clarification not a challenge, they are
treating it like a challenge rather than a notice. Any help on the
wording would be most appreciated.
—-end ticket two FOR NOW!————
Love Light & Unity
manbob
Login 
Register 
Search 
Home
Print this Post 
Topic RSS 
