Comments on: Marc Stevens a US Court innovator who is peacefully rebelling http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/ Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:44:07 +0000 hourly 1 By: Janee Zona Libre http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/comment-page-1/#comment-731 Janee Zona Libre Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:16:50 +0000 http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=392#comment-731 I Will have to come back again when my course load lets up - nevertheless I am taking your RSS feed so I can read your site offline. Thanks. I Will have to come back again when my course load lets up – nevertheless I am taking your RSS feed so I can read your site offline. Thanks.

]]>
By: marty http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/comment-page-1/#comment-649 marty Sat, 20 Feb 2010 14:10:52 +0000 http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=392#comment-649 you left out the middle question ,A judge will tell you that they act as an arbitrator over the proceedings ,impartially.I half wonder if this blog is set up for you to sell books of are you really about the truth.Their is such a thing as the law inequity act that states that we as individuals have the right not to contract with the court.If in fact all courts of law are courts of commerse,via the unified commercial code which is the jurisdiction we are under in court not the constitution.are you selling remedys or is this a situtation that we as a people need to find awnsers for to relieve us of oppression of the truth and tyranny of the law. you left out the middle question ,A judge will tell you that they act as an arbitrator over the proceedings ,impartially.I half wonder if this blog is set up for you to sell books of are you really about the truth.Their is such a thing as the law inequity act that states that we as individuals have the right not to contract with the court.If in fact all courts of law are courts of commerse,via the unified commercial code which is the jurisdiction we are under in court not the constitution.are you selling remedys or is this a situtation that we as a people need to find awnsers for to relieve us of oppression of the truth and tyranny of the law.

]]>
By: Real Alternatives » Blog Archive » The Admiralty Law Scam! http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/comment-page-1/#comment-257 Real Alternatives » Blog Archive » The Admiralty Law Scam! Mon, 28 Dec 2009 09:24:21 +0000 http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=392#comment-257 [...] Here is the link for anyone that finds this interesting and wants to learn more. Tags: admiralty law , lawful rebellion , the law , the law society [...] [...] Here is the link for anyone that finds this interesting and wants to learn more. Tags: admiralty law , lawful rebellion , the law , the law society [...]

]]>
By: steve http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/comment-page-1/#comment-244 steve Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:16:15 +0000 http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=392#comment-244 its great to be able to read a book and email the author while doing so, makes for a very easily understandable read its great to be able to read a book and email the author while doing so, makes for a very easily understandable read

]]>
By: Are the Assyrians ancestors of the lost British? « Independence Limited http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/comment-page-1/#comment-221 Are the Assyrians ancestors of the lost British? « Independence Limited Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:05:57 +0000 http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=392#comment-221 [...] me to speculate whether the war on Iraq was conducted for the control of oil or was it one of those PR campaigns Marc Stevens talks about? Looking at the history of this violent and ruthless group of people called the Anglo-Europeans, [...] [...] me to speculate whether the war on Iraq was conducted for the control of oil or was it one of those PR campaigns Marc Stevens talks about? Looking at the history of this violent and ruthless group of people called the Anglo-Europeans, [...]

]]>
By: GrowBags http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/comment-page-1/#comment-135 GrowBags Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:10:31 +0000 http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=392#comment-135 Ok, I started doing a little research of my own this morning. I am now pretty sure a judge will tell you he represents the Judiciary of England and Wales. This body is supposedly independent of government - see Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (c. 4) at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/ukpga_20050004_en_2#pt2-pb2 So how do we work around this obstacle? Ok, I started doing a little research of my own this morning.

I am now pretty sure a judge will tell you he represents the Judiciary of England and Wales. This body is supposedly independent of government – see Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (c. 4) at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/ukpga_20050004_en_2#pt2-pb2

So how do we work around this obstacle?

]]>
By: GrowBags http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/comment-page-1/#comment-133 GrowBags Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:24:14 +0000 http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=392#comment-133 I like Marc's use of logical reasoning to confound the judicial system. It's a relatively straight forward method of tackling the establishment but does still need thorough research before put into pratice. My key question is: who do judges in this country represent? The Crown, The Ministry of Justice, the government or some other body? Once they cotton on to this line of questioning they are bound to try weasel out of it. It would be prudent to prepare further questions or, even better, produce evidence to show this conflict of interest does exist. (although that does go against Matc's core idea of making the judge contradict himself) For instance, considering the government is a collection of separate corporate entities what is to stop them using this departmentalisation to nullify our claims of a conflict? I think it's important to envisage how the establishment will counter this so we can be better prepared to punch holes in their claims. I like Marc’s use of logical reasoning to confound the judicial system. It’s a relatively straight forward method of tackling the establishment but does still need thorough research before put into pratice.

My key question is: who do judges in this country represent? The Crown, The Ministry of Justice, the government or some other body?

Once they cotton on to this line of questioning they are bound to try weasel out of it. It would be prudent to prepare further questions or, even better, produce evidence to show this conflict of interest does exist. (although that does go against Matc’s core idea of making the judge contradict himself)

For instance, considering the government is a collection of separate corporate entities what is to stop them using this departmentalisation to nullify our claims of a conflict?

I think it’s important to envisage how the establishment will counter this so we can be better prepared to punch holes in their claims.

]]>
By: Slybard http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/comment-page-1/#comment-130 Slybard Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:41:17 +0000 http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=392#comment-130 Marc Stevens stuff is great been using it on odd occasions over the last 5 years! Well worth checking it out if you have to have anything to do with beaurocracy!!! Marc Stevens stuff is great been using it on odd occasions over the last 5 years! Well worth checking it out if you have to have anything to do with beaurocracy!!!

]]>
By: Neil http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/comment-page-1/#comment-122 Neil Wed, 09 Dec 2009 07:05:14 +0000 http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=392#comment-122 For years I had been researching the "law", admiralty, UCC, Freeman ect. and nothing hits you with sheer clarity and reasoning as much as Marc does. For the past 2 years I have done nothing but champion Marc's cause. The problem isn't 1099's ect. it's the government-- pure and simple. Stop your headaches by looking at the facts. For years I had been researching the “law”, admiralty, UCC, Freeman ect. and nothing hits you with sheer clarity and reasoning as much as Marc does. For the past 2 years I have done nothing but champion Marc’s cause. The problem isn’t 1099′s ect. it’s the government– pure and simple. Stop your headaches by looking at the facts.

]]>
By: Donald-Darrel: Forsyth http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/comment-page-1/#comment-121 Donald-Darrel: Forsyth Wed, 09 Dec 2009 03:30:55 +0000 http://lawfulrebellion.org/?p=392#comment-121 http://www.thinkfree.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&Itemid=59 There are some very interesting things going on in regards the the Law these days. Learning the difference between the Law of the Land and Statutes is key to taking back one's Freedom. http://www.thinkfree.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&Itemid=59

There are some very interesting things going on in regards the the Law these days. Learning the difference between the Law of the Land and Statutes is key to taking back one’s Freedom.

]]>