In the reality we live in, we would be wise to accept that we live in a world that has laws, and these laws exist on paper and fortunately some laws exist in our hearts and conscience. Since the dawn of laws-of-man there existed a piece of paper that was held above all others; an Affidavit. A sworn statement of truth that if ‘un-rebutted’ stands as the agreement of the parties, the judgement in commerce and the truth in commerce. So please humour me and answer the following (I have placed my answers in brackets):
- Are you a man or woman? (Yes)
- Are you an artificial entity of the UNITED KINGDOM aka CITIZEN, VESSEL, PERSON, SUBJECT, TAXPAYER, LEGAL FICTION, RESIDENT or INDIVIDUAL? (No)
- Do you belong to the UNITED KINGDOM? (No)
- Should you be coerced into presenting yourself as a ‘public’ entity? (No)
- Are you capable of swearing an oath? (Yes)
- Are you liable to or for any political/corporate rules (statutes)? (No)
- As a man/woman do you have to voluntarily elect to submit to give another party jurisdiction over you? (Yes)
- Should your use of bank notes or any other public facility when alternatives are generally unavailable tie you into a contract of some sort? (No)
- Should you be coerced into receiving vaccinations or any other medical treatments and procedures? (No)
- Are your words your definitions and not for redefining? (Yes)
If you answered the above with the same answer as given then that is your truth, yes? So imagine this as your sworn Affidavit being presented because as a man you are receiving injury from another party, i.e. Corporations:
- The Affiant is a private, living and sentient man.
- The Affiant is not a UNITED KINGDOM “citizen,” “subject,” “vessel” or “person” or any ens legis artificial entity, procedural phantom, legal fiction or juristic personality within the UNITED KINGDOM.
- Affiant is foreign to and without the UNITED KINGDOM.
- Any party that would order, represent or persuade the Affiant to falsely present the Affiant as a UNITED KINGDOM citizen, vessel or person directly or by deception, device, misnomer, mistaken identity, warrant or indictment, real or imagined, would be engaging in Enticement to Slavery.
- Any party that alleges a liability against the Affiant is obligated to produce an Affidavit of Liability to demonstrate such liability.
- The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules and/or codes, including, without limitation, UNITED KINGDOM Codes and statutes and/or codes of any of Respondents’ political subdivisions.
- A legal fiction corporation cannot secure in personam jurisdiction over or against Affiant, a living man, without Affiant’s voluntary election to submit.
- The Affiant’s use of a notary public, Bank of England Promissory Notes, and/or any other public facilities, when alternatives are generally unavailable, does not comprise Affiant’s submission to any political jurisdiction, the creation of an adhesion contract expressly or tacitly with the UNITED KINGDOM and/or any other party real or imagined, or an appearance before any body or tribunal, administrative or judicial, real or imagined.
- It would be both a violation of law and a violation of the Affiant’s God given unalienable rights if any government/corporative agent, officer or employee attempts to, or does in-fact, force, coerce, manipulate and/or deceive the Affiant into receiving any form of medical treatment at anytime whatsoever, including but not limited to vaccinations.
- All words herein are as Affiant defines them.
So, as an operation of law, the Respondent, if they want to rebut, has to rebut your Affidavit point-by-point via a sworn affidavit and providing ‘evidence to support’ why your statement is not true. Are they ever going to be able to do that? Of course they are not; and they never can, because your affidavit offers facts and truth and all the legal world can ever offer is fraud and falsehoods. So what have you got then? You have got a lawfully binding agreement of the highest order that no other party can impair. Not bad hey.
So imagine having a lawfully binding agreement with the CEO of the UK Government (Gordon Brown, d/b/a Prime Minister), and/or the CEO of EUROPE (Herman Van Rompuy, d/b/a President of EUROPE) that cannot be impaired by any party.
As a footnote and for those folk who like to fool around in the fictional and laughable Admiralty courts of the UK and Europe; are you aware that a ‘counterclaim’ is mandatory? Did you know that the only true counterclaim is a ‘lien?’ Did you know that the highest form of lien is a Maritime lien from the private side (man/woman)? Did you know that a Maritime lien is also known as a ‘Commercial lien’ and a Commercial lien is also known as, wait for it, ‘Affidavit of Obligation?’ Did you know that if any public entity attempts to impair/breach your agreements/contracts, you have an instant lien right on the other party? Did you know that Affidavits of Obligations have had judges running out the back door of the courts to avoid being named on the lien? This is hardly going to make it to mainstream media is it!
Folks, Affidavits work because in law, they override everything else that comes before them. Affidavits offer the Facts, Harmony and maybe more importantly when it comes to law, the Agreement of the parties. Whilst of course the legal world offers only lies and falsehoods.
Warmest regards,
Matt.
Nice work Matt. And thanks.
Very interesting and useful to know – Thanks
I have already written out my affidavit, I am awaiting an order of the peper you suggested which should arrive sometime this week, when it does I will send off my love letter to MR GORDON BROWN, who is a definite non-entity.
Thanks for the info, I will have a question for you when I have sent off the above.
Regards
Brian
Ok. Don’t send any private document to MR GORDON BROWN! Send it to Gordon Brown , d/b/a Prime Minister, or First lord of the Treasury, or both if you like.
Regards, Matt.
Is this information valid for use in the US and Canada or any other country for that matter. Also is your information the same as that posted on detaxcanada.org. Is there any evidence that people are using this technique and what is the usual response from the authorities when you try to file 0 tax returns and refute responsibility from bank loans or any other legal authority? I suspect that they take everything you own or at the least make you a no-one in the current world.
Hi again Matt,
I am currently progressing several ‘liens’ against mortgage lenders for their fraud and damage they have caused to their ‘Strawman’ and therefore also my human self.
A quck question;
If when progressing the ‘lien’ the lender decides to repossess your property via the courts and using an independant solicitor to get the reposession order in place, can it be deemed that these solicitors have maybe interfered with your ‘lien’ process and could perhaps be named on the ‘lien’ as ‘lien debtors’?
I apprecaite that all the paperwork for the ‘lien’ is in the private and to get it into the ‘public’ for court in this instance would have to involve a ‘counter-claim’ or a ‘evidential hearing’ (I think). But, having said that, is it possible to name the solicitors and maybe even the County Court Judge on your ‘Lien’ as ‘debtors’ under these circumstances?
It would be excellent if when they serve the case papers to you for the repossession you then name them on you ‘Commercial Lien’ as debtors.
I cannot thank you enough for this excellent informative website.
hi sorry if this has been asked already, but I’m new to this & just wanted to know who do I send this to? do I need a solicitor to witness & or sign this?
thanks for any help, sorry for the dumb questions
andy
An Affidavit is for use in almost any country. I have no idea what detaxcanada.org is all about, apart from the web address suggesting that it wants to de-tax the legal fiction named Canada.
As for evidence: Everyone has heard of Affidavits, so I would suggest that thousands are used everyday, it’s just that most are not getting used creatively. If you state the facts and truth and the process is carried out appropriately, then they will serve the purpose, whatever that is. Remember you are a man, a creator of global credit who does NOT shirk responsibility. Just because you may not be liable does not mean you are not responsible. Regards, Matt.
Hi Matt,
I could really use a chat and some help, Ive got a situation on my hands that I know you will find very interesting, please give me a call, I can call you straight back, Ive put my number in via the form on the contact page
Thanks
Phil
You need to read the full article regarding Affidavits and the previous replies given on here, and you should find what you are looking for. Please do NOT start sending powerful documents like this when you still don’t even know who to send it to and understand the full process. This is your responsiblity; can you handle that? Regards, Matt.
http://lawfulrebellion.org/2009/11/23/get-government-to-lawfully-agree-that-youre-not-a-person-subject-to-acts/
Hi Phil,
please give me an idea of what the issue is first? I wish I had the time to call everyone that has a ‘situation,’ but as I am sure you can appreciate there are not enough hours in the day. That’s not to say I cannot or will not help my friend, but I require more information to give you an honest assessment from my perspective. Regards, Matt.
Hi,
It feel it important to give a WARNING here due to the fact that you mention that you are “progressing with several liens against mortgage lenders” yet the questions you ask demonstrate many holes in your knowledge; and liens are not something you would want to take on lightly, especially as you are probably talking about Maritime Liens (Commercial lien/Affidavit of Obligation).
A mortgage is probably one of the most complex and difficult agreements/contracts to overcome, although certainly attainable if done correctly. The reason a mortgage is so difficult is because of what a mortgage contract is; a common term would be a “Statute Staple.” It is two contracts in one. The first one is called a “simple contract” and this is where you sign to say, “I agree to pay a certain sum on the 1st of the month for 25 years.” But there is an underlying contract where you are also signing to say, “If I default in anyway I consent to giving all rights to this property to you.” By signing this you give confessional judgement and it is a private agreement. That is why technically the court only has to get involved if you cause controversy, as technically you agreed to hand all rights to the property over to the bank. Although it isn’t actually the bank that your contract is now with, you just think it is! This starts to get into the “Trust” issue that is behind all this. Research is now starting to demonstrate that the key behind all this commercial illusion is Trusts that most do not know even exist.
For the record, any party that attempts to impair your lien/administrative process could go onto your lien as a lien debtor. You are attempting a very big process here and I would recommend that you seek guidance and advice from those that specialise in the commercial procedures you wish to undertake, such as; http://www.commercialstanding.org.uk/ and also get hold of Winston Shrout’s “Commercial Lien” DVD; http://www.wssic.com/products/commLein.htm
Become knowledgeable before you take on such a big process. Warmest regards, Matt.
Great post and valuable information; thanks
Peace
Hi Matt and thank you for your feedback. I have watched Winston’s ‘Commercial Liens’ DVD’s several times and have been researching liens for a few months. I appreciate the points raised about their being 2 agreements in place and that if one defaults then one loses the property by agreement/contract. However, I am challenging the fraud behind the lending and the credit issued based on my own promissory note. I have served a build of Notices to create the foundations of the liens to ask the lender to verify the loan and allow inspection of the original agreement/note. Of course the lender has defaulted and remains in dishonour. The fraud is the actual lending and contract. My opinion is that if one element is tackled effectively with a lien then the whole contract must be void. I am aware of Winston mentioning adding other lien debtors but was a little unsure if the solicitors acting independantly could be added onto the lien. I assume from your feedback that it is quite possible if they are made aware of the process taking place and continue.
Thank you
Hi, yes it any party whatsoever attempts to impair your lien they can go on and just by informing them of your intent to do that can be enough for most to steer well clear. I would be make sure that you get the CEO of the bank into an agreement that “any and all contracts, either real or imagined, pertaining to or attributed to account # ******** are hereby null and void.” This should terminate any contracts that the bank sold to 3rd parties related the mortgage. Keep me informed, I look forward to hearing how it is working out for you. Regards, Matt.
Very good and clear piece, however-’ Affiant is foreign to and without the UNITED KINGDOM.’At the end of the day we need help at some point from this
country so in saying this how are we affected?
Apologies for my ignorance, still trying to get my head round this.
Hi,
it is simply creating the void between the artificial world of corporations and the private world of men/women; don’t let that scare you. You are not part of the UK corporation so you are without it and therefore you are a foreign body to it. Any affidavit you use is yours so only use your truth, and don’t put in anything you don’t comprehend, and more importantly, believe as your whole truth. Regards, Matt.
faith
• noun 1 complete trust or confidence. 2 strong belief in a religion. 3 a system of religious belief.
Hi to all here,just a few words of encouragement really is all i wanted to leave with you.After doing a lot of work over last w/end ( end of Nov) we constructed pretty much the same affidavit as shown above with same points of truth laid within it,only a few paragraphs long, and it does work is what i can say.
x
All the guys here are doing a great service to all of us out there who want to gain the knowledge and understand it but you have to go and do soome of the work yourselves too!!!
Don’t listen too much to the doubters,if they cannot listen to reason nor logic, they will try and make you doubt yourself.
Keep up the good work and hope to meet you soon,peace and best wishes Tigs and Deadbeatdad from TPUC
thanks for the positivity! please email us the affidavit, we’re thinking about uploading peoples Affidavits for others to see and take note from.
Thanks guys, this is excellent stuff, and beautifully explained.
I will ask a dumb question:
If Unkie Gordon leaves Downing Street (as expected/prayed for) next year, does the affidavit need to be renewed when/if Unkie Dave gets the keys?
Or, does the affidavit stand, even though we will have named Unkie Gordon as the Respondent?
CR.
In truth, no the affidavit stands. Yet you may find that you have a deeper truth in 6 months so why not send one to whoever the next CEO of the UK is to create another lawful agreement, and also throw one into the CEO of EUROPE as it is nice to have agreements don’t you think? Everyone likes agreements and harmony don’t they? Those of you who believe this runs far deeper than most believe, then maybe you might want to think of creating an agreement with someone who hangs about in the Vatican; the bosses boss! Regards, Matt.
Thanks Matt.
Sending anything to Prez Rumpy might be a tacit agreement or acknowledgement that the EU acquisition of Britain has some legitimacy or lawfulness, so I may not be contacting him. Pope Benny is a different kettle of fish and that might be a smart move.
I’ll start with El Gordo and take it from there.
Namaste,
CR.
Matt,
Please could you upload live example of your affidavit where the process has been completed so we can see exactly how the real Affidavit is done so we don’t make any mistakes?
Thanks,
John
Hi John,
please understand that my documents contain private information so I won’t be putting them over the net. It is my understanding that the process I have laid out is clear and obvious, but maybe that’s because I wrote it. Please feel free to ask any questions yet I would like to see your answers to the questions thus far as this will demonstrate that you are trying to work it out yourself, and that is the powerful way to learn and become confident. Regards, Matt.
Having great difficulty getting affidavits notarised. Anyone know of a notary willing to do so.
Clarification about naturalisation ???
Hi there, I am new to this forum although I have read extensively about this and related material for quite a while.
I wonder if anyone can help me with a question ?
This is in relation to the benefits and privileges that one’s strawman enjoys from the corporation.
It is often written that said benefits arise from any document that has ever been signed by the man or woman, such as applications for NI number, driver licence, passport, etc…..
Also, on various examples that I have come across, our fellow travellers often state in their documents that they have a god-given right or a birth right.
Now, my questions is this. I was not born in England, I only arrived when I was over 20 and some years later I applied for naturalisation which made me a British citizen, or rather made my legal fiction a British Citizen as evidenced by the certificate of registration.
Does that affect anything ? Do I have fewer rights by my not being born in this great country ? Does that adversely affect my ability to use the various methods described here or on other forums?
Thanks
Fred
I have just typed out the Affidavit (and drafted the Notice of Fault etc., and Default), but wondered whether we should address the respondent as Gordon: of the Brown family, or Gordon: Brown.
Any thoughts, or doesn’t it matter?
Please re-read the affidavit and study EXACTLY what you are doing. My friend, the fact that you asked that question informs me that you are not ready to do this process. Please wait until you can stand under this type of document and have a very good awareness of the WHOLE document and the complete process, or it won’t have any weight for you when you may require it. These are very powerful documents so please make sure you are ready for the responsibilty; you have to own this process. When you believe you are ready, you address it exactly as stated.
Regards, Matt.
Many thanks for the correction. Yes, I realise my mistake.
What is the difference between a solicitor and a notary and what exactly is it that they do differently during the process of signing and witnessing the affidavits?
I’ve heard that most solicitors offices have a notary that works there or someone who can provide notarial service (whatever that is?). How would we know whether a solicitor can act as notary (go between/private side?) or in capacity as solicitor (legal fiction land)?
I can’t recall who told me that most solicitors have notary working there but I have also heard the opposite that there are only a handful in the country and they’re difficult to find, and if you do find one they might not wish to help you and witness or sign your documents.
Anyone who has followed Matts process or used a Notary… How much more does it cost to use a true Notary? Is it a lot more expensive than just a solicitor?
Do Notaries also make copies for their records? And do they file it so it is available for the “public/private” record?
The Affidavit that Matt has done, I am just wondering why it goes to the prime minister? Wouldn’t you have to keep sending a new one each time there’s a new prime minister (change of ceo of the corporation?)? And are we just a subdivision now of a bigger corporation the EU?
You’ll have to forgive me if I’m being thick but wouldn’t it be better to just send it once to the Queen or Elizabeth Tudor d/b/a head of state of the corporation? If you have to do a new affidavit everytime there’s a change in pm it could end up costing a lot of money to use notary all the time?
I’m not sure the prime minister or chancellor would ever bother to reply no matter how you address it to them i.e. their private side real man? They would just simply claim immunity surely? Whatever they do they can get away with under diplomatic immunity? Even if you send it to their real flesh and blood private side, is that side ever going to be in or to answer? If there was to be an answer wouldn’t it come from their legal side with limited liability and diplomatic immunity? And if they were to respond they would for sure send it back to your legal fiction not your private side?
Thanks Matt.
I am understanding more the power of affidavit. For the question of is “do my affidavit still stand after Gordon Brown leaves office”, here is my take on it…please let me know what you think.
Gordon Brown is the CEO of a corporation UNITED KINGDOM. When a CEO of a company accepts something e.g. a contract on behalf of the corporation, the corporation still needs to honor the contract after the CEO leaves. This is the same for the CEO of UNITED KINGDOM. So after the Gordon Brown leaves and someone else become the CEO, the affidavit still holds. Anyway, there is nothing stopping us from going through the same process with the new CEO.
Seems like the trump card , but i at present am having trouble getting a Notary to sign my aff, its not to present to the government or the queen but to present to my employers to stop the mistreatment of me and others!
Is a Notary actually obliged to sign all documents presented or are they acting outside of their duty by condeming my aff?
Hi,
what exactly are you saying to the Notary, or their secretary, in regards to having your documents verified? Also please download the sample docs on this article ( http://lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/18/toolbox-stop-taking-the-pcn/ ), as it explains the process of having documents verified by two (2) private verifiers instead of a Notary. Regards, Matt.
hi matt
Well so far i have had 2 Notary dismiss my aff, the two networked together on the phone (even tho i picked them at random from online search). The second one dissmissed it outright with contempt saying things like ” what on earth is an agent of nesessity?” and “what is an esttopel?”and what the hell is a commercial injury??ect ect. I basicaly used a template from a couple of people you perhaps know within this movement,Mo& Sher . I built my aff within the body of their temp and it seems to me that the objections by the Notarys were on the clauses and terms in the body ie, agent of ness, commercial injury, estoppel and the deadline i placed for reply???She did ask me who i had got this advice from, and actualy asked me if i could explin the terms to her, i stuggled to explain and asked her if she was not obliged to sign for me providing that what i wrote was truth in my eyes and understanding? she said no i am not obliged to sign and to take it away and rethink about what i was trying to do!!I also asked a very posh spoken Notary in London who was decent enough to ring me back, What is a Notarys duty?..He said that it was 1)To Verify a persons ID) 2)To see that the writer knew what he had written 3)To Check the doc was “Fit for purpose”
Cheers Paul
Hi Paul,
Now that you have expanded on what you are doing I would also have doubts if I were the Notary. Please remember that although you are only asking a Notary to verify that it was you that signed the document, I think it fair to assume that some are going to scan over the document and considering that they are also signing to say that it is ready to be produced into any judicial hearing in the world, you can’t hold it against them to not play ball if the documents are looking ropy and/or it is clear that you have no idea what you are talking about.
I am always suggesting that people do NOT use templates and that they take the wording and make it their own, and research the terms and phrases they do not understand until they can own it as theirs. You mention that you had trouble explaining what you had written, so my friend, how is that your truth? You are verging on committing commercial suicide with that sort of ignorance. By the way Paul, I mean all this with respect, and it would seem that you need telling before you continue to cause yourself unnecessary risks and/or harm.
For your information I do not know Mo & Sher so I cannot comment on their procedure etc, but if they know what they are saying on their paperwork and they believe it to be true, then that’s cool, but until you know exactly what you are saying on your paperwork to the last full stop, and can stand under it against any form of scrutiny then my suggestion is to NOT use it. Regards, Matt.
hiMatt
Yes you are right i need more study of the terms in the body of the aff!The guys who have helped me so far are the guys from tpuc ,John har and Deadbeat and Tigs, from Tigs post above it seems that they are wrapping their aff around something from on this site or what you have used. Would it be poss to mail you a draft of it? i will be able to rectify any mistakes and perhaps it is a tad too aggressive?I basicaly understand the terms ie estoppel but i dont grasp the agent of nessesity comment in the template, and the warning that is capitalised at the foot of the aff, Please could i trouble you to take a look and point out any glareing mistakes? I clicked your name on your posts and it seems the link to your details is not working!
Cheers Paul
This is very interesting. Is this single affidavit intended as an alternative for the NOU/COR process (also a process requiring Notarisation)?
How does one on the one hand disassociate from the fiction and the whole NI Number related relationship with the state in terms of further taxation (both direct & Indirect) whilst still retaining rights to the fully paid up state pension entitlements that have cost some of us so dear?
Your thoughts would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Dan.
Hi Matt
I do understand the process i want to undertake
To write my TRUTH
To get it from the private to the public(Via Notary)
To serve on the respondant
To allow time for rebuttal( this wont happen)
To follow up with a Notice of default(Notarised)
To allow further time to remedy
To give a notice to cure and remedy the situ
Job done i am at this point on equal terms with my opponent and they would be silly to abuse me further or i can trigger in law court the claim i make in my affi !!!
Any questions from any legal persons and i would say ” Refer to document”? Anymore evidence after would be irrelevant!! Yes is this True
Regards Paul
reborn…
The way I look at it, is that you would need to send this type of affidavit every time to the new ceo of the corporation because once for example Gordon Brown loses election to Cameron it will be a different administration. Whereas if it were China even if one leader dies and a new one replaces him, it would not be a new administration it would still be the same administration. My understanding here for the United Kingdom Corp is that you would have to surely do it every time for each new PM “Unless” you sent it to the head of state e.g. the Queen or Elizabeth Tudor d/b/a head of state/sovereign.
tomsam1red…
I also have an issue with my employer too. (ppl would really hate the company I work for they are notorious) From what I have heard a lot of people have been having issues the last year because of the economy they treat you a lot worse and try get rid of people, give them pay cuts and downgrade them. It’s going on all over the place unfortunately. You hear so many stories just from reading advice columns in newspapers in the employment section. It sucks. I’m trying to resolve the issues I have at the moment I’m not too hopeful though. I think ultimatey the only choice for free men is to have their own cash in hand business outside of legal land.
The reply you got from the Notary about his duty doesn’t sound too promising to me and sounds just like what a solicitor would do?
1)To Verify a persons ID) 2)To see that the writer knew what he had written 3)To Check the doc was “Fit for purpose”
It says “person”. Unless they provide both public and private then this sounds like it is to do with your legal fiction?
I think maybe with Matts affidavit it would be more simple and it is quite clear that it is from private side and maybe a Notary would be able to help and deal with private side I don’t know. I completely comprehend Matts Affidavit the only part I don’t is about sending to the Gordon Brown d/b/a and also not 100% sure what a Notary is and what he does that’s different to solicitor.
I am stil proceeding with my queeny affidavit from tpuc and will also be doing the nouicor. What Matt has said though does make sense and I may also do this to cover all bases. I just need to know those two things, about who I’m sending to and what exactly the Notary is and what they do.
Will have to read up on this some more and watch the videos on this site too.
I am moving out of a rented house and suppose I could send an affidavit to the land lord and to the agent stating that the house is in good order as when i moved in, invade they try to scam me. What do you guys think?
Hi Paul,
You are not using a Notary to get it from the private to the public, you are using the Notary at this stage because he can be private (as well as public), and therefore when you send it to the respondent on the private side, i.e. Gordon Brown, d/b/a Prime Minister, the whole process remains as private administration. Do NOT make your private administration public at any time. Whenever you send copies of your private administration you always want to send to the private side, i.e. Mary Smith d/b/a CEO of SUCH AND SUCH COUNCIL, or Peter Brown d/b/a Chief Constable of SUCH AND SUCH POLICE AUTHORITY, and mark the envelope PRIVATE. If it ever goes into court evidence then you must make sure that it gets put into the judges/magistrates private file and not the clerks public file. There are two files for every court case, and the only file a real man or woman wants to use for their private administration is the private file, and always make sure you get some form of reciept to indicate you stipulated that it must remain private and to ensure it doesn’t end up lost.
Also you have got the Notice of Default and Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure the wrong way round. You send the Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure after the affidavit and the Notice of Default last.
Also you are not on equal terms with your so-called opponent; you operate as a man, sponsor of the credit, whose word is his bond and who operates under unlimited commercial liabilty and always tells the truth… they cannot match that!
Regards,
Matt.
Yep, there is nothing wrong with that, although a simple written and signed agreement might be just as well in this situation. If the landlord is a distance away you could always ask if he has someone he/she trusts that could sign for him/her to say that everything is fine.
Regards, Matt.
Hello, I have finished my notice of understanding and intent, and about to get notarized.
Just curious what happens if i have 5 registered mailed out, 4 do not reply in the time i say(which is a good thing), BUT 1 did reply to rebut with in my time i say.
Good post and this mail helped me alot in my college assignement. Say thank you you as your information.
hi matt
i was wondering if i could put or include the word children on my affidavit. you see one of my daughters was sexualy abused in school 2 and half years ago by a pupil. the abuser got away with it all the help, my daughter got none. this affected the whole of the family, being threatened and attacked by the abusers family (travelers). this was all reported to the police, to no avail. (as we all know, there only interested in car crime)
anyway, 10 months ago the social services decided to issue court procedings to put all my children in care, and of course with there bull shit and lies they got there wish. it is only an intrim care order, the main court date is set for february 2010. it looks like they will win again. i would just like a little advice from your good self. would you let them know about the affidavit before it hade been finalised? or wait until it has been finalised? can i put anything in the affidavit about the children? if so, how would you word it. thank you very much and keep up the great work.
john
hello john… im sorry for whats happened… i would suggest you get in touch with Dead Beat Dads, if he cant help, then he will know who can… http://www.deadbeatdadsassociation.co.uk/ also – if you email us, we can pass you onto brian gerrish, UK Column, who might be able to help.
Notary in Glasgow didn’t have any issues with this today, had a quick read and that was that.
Now I know why so many people love this site
why qiana?